[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: 2.4 ghz downconverters
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 2.4 ghz downconverters
- From: Michael Tondee <mat_62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:42:45 -0400
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
It's nice to know my downconverter I've hardly ever used will still be
able to be used somewhere. I live in a rural area so WifFi pollution
shouldn't be much of a problem for me. (yet) I understand the logic
behind not putting S band on Eagle but it still leaves me with a bit of
a sour taste in my mouth. I know, as it was put here, "the genie is out
of the bottle" but if we just up and run to a different frequency every
time there is interference or a threat of such., we soon won't have any
frequencies left to run too.
73,
Michael, W4HIJ
Robert McGwier wrote:
> P3E, which AMSAT-NA supports with effort, fund raising, cheer
> leading, etc. will indeed have an S band transmitter. There is no
> reason to cast off usable equipment. If P3E goes well, you will have
> it for a decade!
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> i8cvs wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@mcn.net>
>> To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 2.4 ghz downconverters
>>
>>
>>> Too bad for him. With no eagle Mode S downlink there won't be much
>>>
>> demand.
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home