Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 vs 9913F?

["Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

LMR-400 does not suck up moisture like a sponge producing strange (bad) 
effects and it survuves longer in the South Dakota sun (and winters :-)  ).

73,
Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE@mailaps.org>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 4:19 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 vs 9913F?


> Hi,
>
> I am going to be replacing the feeds to my tower, and am looking at the
> above two types of cable.  According to the loss tables, they have
> essentially the same losses in the range of interest, with LMR-400 being
> fractionally better and also cheaper.  Any practical experience input on
> either the cable or connectors?  These will be to the tower, not around 
> the
> rotators, for which I am using Ultraflex.
>
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org