[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: 13 Satellite are not amateur satellites
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: 13 Satellite are not amateur satellites
- From: "H. Paul Shuch, N6TX" <n6tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:13:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <448078BA.7030005@ngunn.net>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF wrote:
> True but that mission staytement is strictly only applicable to the
> geographical area represented by Amsat NA.
Nigel,
As a globalist, I would never restrict my educational activities only
to North America. I have taught in about twenty countries on five
continents, and even though my official title was conferred by AMSAT-NA,
I consider education a worthy GLOBAL endeavour.
> The resulting satellites cover the whole world.
Which is exactly why they require, and receive, IARU frequency
coordination. Remember, the I stands for International.
> Those that built them were, in the main, also Amsat members and licensed
> radio amateurs. That's not the case with the university projects.
Those CubeSat students who are greeted with warmth and encouragement,
who are made to feel welcome by the amateur radio community, often
become hams and AMSAT members. Those who are treated with belligerence
and made to feel somehow inferior will never join us. We must take
great care not to become too exclusive, lest we each end up belonging to
a club of one.
> Lets encourage them to earn licenses,
Ah, we do!
> not freeload our hard earned
> frequency allocations.
Freeload? By this you mean educational projects should not be
encouraged to use our under-utilised amateur frequency allocations, thus
helping to protect them from commercial incursion? Listen around the
satellite bands -- it's not exactly QRM City up there. Perhaps you're
also suggesting that we should not let non-members freeload on AMSAT's
hard earned web space and bb? But how then are we ever to attract new
members, if we slam the door in the face of prospects?
In short, I am in no way diminished by the presence of non-members on
this bb, nor am I disadvantaged when another 435 MHz telemetry beacon
shows up from LEO. If only one CubeSat leads to only one new ham and
AMSAT member (I'm sure the numbers are significantly more extensive),
but if that new member goes on to become another Jan King or Tom Clark
or Perry Klein -- or even another Nigel Gunn! then we are all well served.
73, Paul
--
Dr. H. Paul Shuch, N6TX
AMSAT Director of Education
n6tx@amsat.org www.qsl.net/n6tx
Grid Square FN11lh
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home