[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: 13 Satellite are not amateur satellites
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: 13 Satellite are not amateur satellites
- From: "Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF" <nigel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:43:22 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <44804E0E.4010807@amsat.org>
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
H. Paul Shuch, N6TX wrote:
>
> In all due respect to my good friend Hans, I must disagree with
> part of his statement. Under certain circumstances, a CubeSat CAN AND
> SHOULD BE considered an amateur radio satellite. If you read the
> AMSAT mission statement on our website,
True but that mission staytement is strictly only applicable to the
geographical area represented by Amsat NA.
The resulting satellites cover the whole world.
> I remind you all of the numerous early OSCARs that were built by
> students in Melbourne, Surrey, Marburg, Weber State, Japan, and
> elsewhere. All were true ham satellites, even those that only carried
> beacons.
Those that built them were, in the main, also Amsat members and licensed
radio amateurs. That's not the case with the university projects.
> Another is encouraging the next generation of hams/technologists.
Lets encourage them to earn licenses, not freeload our hard earned
frequency allocations.
>
>
--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nigel A. Gunn. 59 Beadlemead, Milton Keynes, MK6 4HF, England.
Tel +44 (0)1908 604004 mobile +44 (0)7765 471661
e-mail nigel@ngunn.net www http://www.ngunn.net
Amateur radio stations G8IFF, KC8NHF
Member of ARRL, GQRP Club, QRPARCI, SOC #548, Flying Pig #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, MKARS, RAYNET
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home