[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: Illegal cordless phones (was Interference on AO-51)



So, we're assuming the specs on an illegal piece of equipment are accurate?  
It wouldn't surprise me if the 8.5W is measured by the same folks that 
produce 200 watt car stereo speakers for $19.95... for the pair.

But, if true, it's another aspect of illegality.  Probably violates the RF 
exposure limits...

Greg  KO6TH


----Original Message Follows----
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re:  Illegal cordless phones (was  Interference      
on AO-51)
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:26:12 -0500

The HANDSET has 8.5W RF out???!!!  At least the calls will be short...  ;-)

George, KA3HSW

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Shirville" 
<g.shirville@btinternet.com>
To: "Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF" <nigel@ngunn.net>; <KA2AEV@aol.com>
Cc: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Illegal cordless phones (was Interference on 
AO-51)


>Checkout this webpage for another one!
>
>http://www.nanfone.com/result_long.asp?id=2
>
>I am sure the PLL can be adjusted to cover 2 metres..
>
>I wonder if they would be legal anywhere in the world? If not why are they 
>being produced?
>
>They will make 144-146MHz unusable for satellite uplinks.
>
>73
>
>Graham G3VZV
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home