[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: Illegal cordless phones (was Interference on AO-51)
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Illegal cordless phones (was Interference on AO-51)
- From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:26:12 -0500
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=FfYZdEA7hwKhLSwhTpIX1AGtHgHb3Sj0hRmS3OPs0o5p17Lnxu8Q179KRDo9UoYj; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
The HANDSET has 8.5W RF out???!!! At least the calls will be short... ;-)
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@btinternet.com>
To: "Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF" <nigel@ngunn.net>; <KA2AEV@aol.com>
Cc: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Illegal cordless phones (was Interference on
AO-51)
> Checkout this webpage for another one!
>
> http://www.nanfone.com/result_long.asp?id=2
>
> I am sure the PLL can be adjusted to cover 2 metres..
>
> I wonder if they would be legal anywhere in the world? If not why are they
> being produced?
>
> They will make 144-146MHz unusable for satellite uplinks.
>
> 73
>
> Graham G3VZV
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home