[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: bugs bugs everywhere bugs
At 06:52 PM 4/3/2006, wa6fwf@amsat.org wrote:
>Hello All,
> In case anyone else runs across this, the new webpage is using
> Unicode characters, to properly
>display you need your encoding set to auto select/user defined,
>anything else is hit or miss if it will
>display properly, this is on XP with I.E. 6.0.
IE 6.0 on XP is what I run primary - I test with about 15 browsers on
10 computers. Even though my furnace is gas, I tell everyone that I
have electric heat :-)
> For Linux running KDE using Konqueror, telling Konqueror to fake
> its identification as I.E. 4.0 on
>W2K it will display in a manner that is readable.
Telling any browser to "Fake" something is dangerous. Opera, for
example, will let you enter a browser identification string. If you
enter "Joe's Browser" there is nothing I will do other than send you
off to never-never land (Netscape 4.7 compatible). Let your browser
be what it is - if it isn't supported and you think it should be, file a bug.
>this is for the sat status page
>btw http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/satellites/status.php
>
> I wont debate the merits of creating WebPages that require a
> particular encoding,other than maybe
>a small note at the top mentioning it requires a particular encoding
>would be nice.
We use Unicode - Universal Encoding. If you want me to tell people
in other countries to bugger off let me know. Otherwise I'd prefer
to support them. It's an industry standard and has been for many years.
> I frequent many Nippon sites which have some really outstanding
> technical resources and they
>sometimes do not present well unless you pick a western encoding for
>your web browser which
> is why it was not displaying well for me, but I have not yet had
> any problems on any other site so far...
> being that Amsat-NA is linked Internationally many times I will
> leave it to Amsat-NA to decide if
> the new page coding is better than the old.
Probably because you don't use OpenType fonts - sometime around the
turn of the century (this one - 2000, not the last one) Microsoft and
Adobe put aside their differences and converted their fonts to
OpenType. OpenType fonts have been freely distributed ever
since. OpenType is Unicode encoded - if you are using XP all of your
fonts are OpenType unless you have disabled using OpenType or have
told XP to limit itself to the old standard of "Code Pages" at which
time XP will use the non-OpenType encodings. We don't force code
pages because we prefer to let everyone use Unicode.
We are still 4.0 transitional. This is because if we were to convert
to 4.0 Strict we would blow everyone out of the water who didn't play
by these rules.
BTW - all of my remarks are made as the person who generally
volunteers about 60 hours a week to maintain the website or do
presentations, not someone who is on the BOD. Those decisions and
actions are separate. The time I spend as a member of the BOD and
the decisions I make there are separate from the views I express here.
73,
Emily
>73
>Kevin WA6FWF
>Amsat-UK #6505
>
>
> > Hello All,
> > To Whom It May concern,
> > just as a FYI the amsat-na satellite status page is having
> problems, i.e. 6.0 shows 6 triangles only, konqueror shows zero,
> > mozilla looks like it shows them all but they are boxes.
> > And if you wondering why I'm posting here and not on the bug
> report page is because when I fill out the bug page and hit submit
> > it says page not found, so the bugs have bugs have bugs...
> >
> > 73
> > Kevin WA6FWF
> > Amsat-UK #6505
> > ----
>----
>Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home