[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: AO-54?
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-54?
- From: Steve Meuse <smeuse@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:26:13 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <005e01c62cfe$ac5f2630$0201a8c0@box>; from GREGWYCOFF@havilandtelco.com on Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:26:14PM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>, Greg Wycoff <GREGWYCOFF@havilandtelco.com>, amsat-bb@amsat.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Greg Wycoff expunged (GREGWYCOFF@havilandtelco.com):
> suitsat is a good example as to why the "OSCAR number policy"
> http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/information/faqs/numbers.php should go under
> a major overhaul, it is very broad and has no real requirments to be met.
> there is a big difference between an experiment that has a life of just a
> few weeks and a real amatuer radio transpounder that is expected to last for
> years providing communications voice or data. not trying to take anything
> away from suitsat because it was a great school project for the young
> students, and any exposer that amatuer radio can get is a good thing.
This isn't directed specifically at you Greg but....
It's just a number!
Last I heard there isn't a shortage of positive integers.
-Steve
N1JFU
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home