Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] Nitwit hams

[Jim Walls <k6ccc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And besides that, in the USA (where this is reportedly taking place), a 
repeater is not legal anywhere between 145.500 and 146.000.

§97.205 Repeater station.
<snip>

(b) A repeater may receive and retransmit only on the 10 m and shorter 
wavelength frequency bands except the 28.0-29.5 MHz, 50.0-51.0 MHz, 
144.0-144.5 MHz, 145.5-146.0 MHz, 222.00-222.15 MHz, 431.0-433.0 MHz and 
435.0-438.0 MHz segments.

-- 
73
-------------------------------------
Jim Walls - K6CCC
k6ccc@amsat.org
Ofc:  818-548-4804
http://home.earthlink.net/~k6ccc
AMSAT Member 32537 - WSWSS Member 395


John B. Stephensen wrote:

> The occupied bandwidth for FM is approximately twice the audio bandwith plus
> the deviation. This is 2*(3+5) or 16 kHz so 145.790 should be the highest
> allocated frequency for analog FM repeaters. D-Star digital voice uses half
> the bandwidth so it would be OK.
> 
> 73,
> 
> John
> KD6OZH
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Luc Leblanc VE2DWE" <lucleblanc6@videotron.ca>
> To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 04:54 UTC
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] Nitwit hams
> 
> 
> 
>>On 7 Feb 2006 at 22:36, WIlliam L Reyna Jr wrote:
>>
>>
>>>We have our share of stupidity here too.
>>>Someone over in Staten Island has set up a repeater on 145.795 so you
> 
> know
> 
>>>what that does to the regular iss down link.
>>>A few months ago they blabed right through a school contact wondering
> 
> "where
> 
>>>that was coming from"......Go figure.
>>
>>145.800-146.0 Mhz exclusively for satellite communication at 145.795 plus
> 
> a
> 
>>deviation of 5KHZ they are not transmitting in the satellite band
> 
> allocations.
> 
>>We have here an old packet node with about 2 or 3 regulars on 145.790 they
> 
> are
> 
>>not interfering too much as they are not too close but i can hear them
> 
> mainly
> 
>>at ISS LOS. I can imagine 795 can be rough at times...
>>
>>Nothing is perfect on earth and in space too...
>>
>>
>>
>>"-"
>>"It is not the class of license the amateur holds, but the class of the
> 
> amateur
> 
>>that holds the license."
>>
>>Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
>>AMSAT 33583
>>Skype VE2DWE
>>www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
>>----
>>Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> 
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org