[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: lower frequency downlinks
At 11:39 2/1/06 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Andrew said..
>
>>RS 10/11 and RS 12/13 were packages attached to larger Russian satellites
>>(whose proper names escape me at the moment). Both of these put out whopper
>>signals on 10m and 2m, but when power is cheap and easy, thats much easier
>>to do.
>>
snip
>
>These small craft although in LEO (I believe 1000Kms) put out cracking
>signals and were very popular birds.
>Much of course depends on whether you use a piece of wet string or a proper
>antenna on the ground:-) Signal strength is a subjective issue.
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
GM1SXX de G3BVU BT
Al,
Is not "wetness" also subjective?
Distilled water is an insulator, but there may be impurities in the string.
If you keep a pack of Foxhounds together with a pink jacket and topper
you'll do much better.
Additionally, your horse can make a (large) valuable contribution.
73s, de John G3BVU SK
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home