[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: lower frequency downlinks
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lower frequency downlinks
- From: Steve Meuse <smeuse@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:20:06 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <3847ac6e0601310316u51bc22adx1ce95b6be1e75e2a@mail.gmail.com>; from k0hzi.mn@gmail.com on Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 05:16:18AM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>, Jerry W <k0hzi.mn@gmail.com>, fparker <fparker@paulbunyan.net>, amsat-bb@amsat.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Jerry W expunged (k0hzi.mn@gmail.com):
> Fred,
>
> Along with a few others, I tested PSK31 on PCSAT-2. 10 meter up-link
> and 145.825 down-link, was very difficult to keep the PSK signal tuned
> along with the doppler shift even with NOVA and WispDDE. So some work
> needs to be done with PSK to compensate for doppler if it is going to
> be used on satellites IMHO.
Don't forget, the doppler rate for X frequency at HEO is slower than for a LEO. I like the Idea of a PSK type transponder and it might be a good platform for experiment for other digital modes (like a psk with the ability to compensate for doppler
-Steve
N1JFU
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home