[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: Phonetics on FM sats
- Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Phonetics on FM sats
- From: "Jose M. Valdes R. YV5LIX" <yv5lix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:32:18 -0000
- Thread-Index: AcYaKNMjkIjMMmvXSvaSkas4F7UZRQAAeBXAAAQwuHA=
Hello John,
Personally I use always use phonetics, but to answer your question if you
are working a station that speaks your own language whichever way you like
is ok, but if you are working a stations whose home language is other that
yours, it is imperative to use phonetics; while working LEO's you may run
into some Central and South American stations with a limited command of the
English language and will better understand your call if you use phonetics.
73/DX Jose M. Valdes R. (Joe) YV5LIX
eQSL.cc Advisory Board Member
QSL manager EA7FTR
SYSOP YV5LIX DX Cluster
telnet://yv5lix.org.ve:7300
VHF Packed: 145.430 using C YV5LIX
http://www.yv5lix.org.ve
The site has an online log search.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:39 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Phonetics on FM sats
> How do satellite operators feel about using phonetics on the FM sats?
> Personally, I find it helpful it stations do, since many letters sound
like
> each other, and getting the correct callsign is important for AMSAT
> and
ARRL
> satellite awards. I know phonetics are frowned upon on repeaters, but
this is
> a whole different ballgame.
>
> 73s John NE0P
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home