[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
- From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:04:46 -0500
>>> "John B. Stephensen" <kd6ozh@comcast.net> 12/30/05 8:37 PM
> FM ATV uses a... 20 MHz wide [signal]. The minimum
>required signal... is... -93 dBm. At 350 km away
>the path loss is 153 dB at 2400 MHz. A 2 foot dish
>has 20 dBi gain so a minimum of 10 W EIRP is required.
But we also have to add that the path is 2000 km to
the horizon, 1500 km when ISS is at 5 deg and 1200
km when it is above 10 deg. So we should probably
plan for the 1500 km range which takes another 12 dB.
Or would need a tracking 8' dish. Bummer.
What about VSB AM? This would have 2 advantages.
1) ENable the use of simple readilly available MDS
down converters infront of any TV set.
2) Reduces the bandwidth from 20 MHz to 6 which
should get back about 5 dB.
If we did not use the sound sub-carrier could we do
it in 5 MHz? We could use a 10W 2m FM downlink
for the audio.
>However, there are at least 3 standards for analog
>color TV so only a fraction of hams will be able to
>receive the signal.
But we would use it as a bent-pipe transponder, so
what comes down is what goes up. In each country,
what they see is what they transmit.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 21:33 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
> OOPS... Big change in the original ATV satellite premise:
>
> The opportunity I am working on is on the ISS, so
> we cannot TX on 70 cm since that will probably be
> the main uplink band for all the other ham stuff
> on board. SO I guess that means it will need to
> be 2.4 GHz downlink.
>
> THus, all it takes to receive it is a standard MDS
> downconverter which plugs directly into a TV
> set. OK, lets study that approach. Do the link
> calculations and lets see how much TX power
> (to an omni) is needed for receiving on a 2' dish.
>
> de Wb4APR, Bob
>
> >>> mvonlanthen@vtx.ch 12/30/05 12:13 PM >>>
> > 1 - The satellite rules were changed to allow HAM TV downlinks between
> > 420 and 440 MHz.
> > 2 - We could decide which of the five HAM TV standard channels to
> > use: 421.25, 426.25, 427.25, 434.00, 439.25.
>
> hb9afo---------
>
> After short study, it's not permitted to use the 1200 MHz band in the
> sens space-earth as i was proposing in my precedent message. The best
> solution would be to use DATV on 430 MHz but only between 435 et 438
> MHz, the sole permitted space segment in Europe.
>
> So use the 434 MHz channel pushed to 436,5 MHz per example for the
> downlink space to earth and 1200 MHz for uplink earth to space. But use
> DATV instead of normal ATV, it would be much easier.
>
> 73
> michel hb9afo
>
> _______________________________________________
> ATNA mailing list
> ATNA@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/atna
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home