[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
- From: "kc6uqh" <kc6uqh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:04:17 -0800
Hi All,
I am active on ATV on 2441.5 and 10,400. A P5 picture requires a -87 dBm,
minimum bandwidth is 16 MHz, subcarrier is calculate seperately as it has a
lower deveation that the video. Going to wider deviation actually increases
the capture effect.
An AM VSB signal requires a -67 dBm for a P5 picture, but fits in a 6 MHz
bandwidth. AM is cranky, requires linear amplification and even a slight non
linearity tollerated on SSB will regenerate the lower side band.
FM ATV has it's advantages, 100 times less power, linear amplifier not
needed, and a quality picture.
Art,
KC6UQH
----- Original Message -----
From: "John B. Stephensen" <kd6ozh@comcast.net>
To: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
> According to the ARRL Image Communications Handbook, FM ATV uses 4 MHz
> deviation and a 5.8 MHz sound subcarrier so the signal is about 20 MHz
> wide.
> The minimum required signal at the receiver is 7 microvolts or -93 dBm,.
> If
> ISS is 350 km away the path loss is 153 dB at 2400 MHz. A 2 foot dish has
> 20
> dBi of gain so a minimum of 10 W EIRP is required. 100 W is more
> realistic
> so that there is 10 dB margin.
>
> However, there are at least 3 standards for analog color TV so only a
> fraction of hams will be able to receive the signal. A digital signal that
> could be received on a PC would be better as the Internet provides the
> only
> worldwide standard for image transmission. If the astronauts had the
> appropriate accessories for their PCs they could use the system. A 384
> kbps
> link would provide enough bandwidth.
>
> 73,
>
> John
> KD6OZH
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>
> To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 21:33 UTC
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [ATNA] More thoughts about HAM TV from space
>
>
>> OOPS... Big change in the original ATV satellite premise:
>>
>> The opportunity I am working on is on the ISS, so
>> we cannot TX on 70 cm since that will probably be
>> the main uplink band for all the other ham stuff
>> on board. SO I guess that means it will need to
>> be 2.4 GHz downlink.
>>
>> THus, all it takes to receive it is a standard MDS
>> downconverter which plugs directly into a TV
>> set. OK, lets study that approach. Do the link
>> calculations and lets see how much TX power
>> (to an omni) is needed for receiving on a 2' dish.
>>
>> de Wb4APR, Bob
>>
>> >>> mvonlanthen@vtx.ch 12/30/05 12:13 PM >>>
>> > 1 - The satellite rules were changed to allow HAM TV downlinks between
>> > 420 and 440 MHz.
>> > 2 - We could decide which of the five HAM TV standard channels to
>> > use: 421.25, 426.25, 427.25, 434.00, 439.25.
>>
>> hb9afo---------
>>
>> After short study, it's not permitted to use the 1200 MHz band in the
>> sens space-earth as i was proposing in my precedent message. The best
>> solution would be to use DATV on 430 MHz but only between 435 et 438
>> MHz, the sole permitted space segment in Europe.
>>
>> So use the 434 MHz channel pushed to 436,5 MHz per example for the
>> downlink space to earth and 1200 MHz for uplink earth to space. But use
>> DATV instead of normal ATV, it would be much easier.
>>
>> 73
>> michel hb9afo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ATNA mailing list
>> ATNA@mailman.qth.net
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/atna
>> ----
>> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home