[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
QFH feeder ?
- Subject: [amsat-bb] QFH feeder ?
- From: "SV1BSX" <sv1bsx@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:27:45 +0200
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.gr; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=z7oxcLMm0XhT35B04A7J/ptUWzksVU80R6RNqHCw9GlfFOQVt3wvtS5zP4I+vgMcQLtPxaHE80wRJFNTSva/Nx3sTEdNgXiiGrwDsaYhFiyTOHth4YOKkCitaVkktv/X8hDa4o2zmX/MgL2VDbaBzKIrQZIRkQpeOMudz/qqmU4= ;
Hello AMSATs
I read 2 different articles about the half-turn / half-wavelength QFH.
However I noticed that, the first article described that the "feeder"
becomes from the down part of SMALL loop, while in the second article the
feeder becomes from the down part of BIG loop!
(Both designs use the "infinite balun" technique.)
Both articles have equal Loops (L-Big=0.26 Lampda , L-Small=0.238 Lampda),
but the
Vertical Lenght is exactly the opposite between BIG & Small loops.
I wonder... is it the same ???
I made few months ago my 1st QFH-antenna (UHF) following the first article
and now I'm thinking if that is right or not !
Any comment is welcome.
73, Mak SV1BSX
sv1bsx@yahoo.gr
http://www.qsl.net/sv1bsx
LAN eMail-Server: This Email has been checked by NAV 2005
Virus Free
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home