[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: P3E information

Piero Calvi-Parisetti wrote:
> Dear all,
> I have just made my modest contribution to the fundraising campaign for P3E,
> and I would like to raise again some questions, as I did maybe a year ago.
> First of all, please understand that these questions are in no way intended
> as criticism towards AMSAT-DL, whose work I utmostly admire and respect.
> My perplexity remains - as it has been the case for over a year now - over
> information/communication issues.
> I am convinced that for a large part of the satellite enthusiasts community,
> P3E is not just "the next big thing" - it is "the thing". Many people, like
> myself, are somewhat hung on the launch of the bird in order to re-start
> amateur satellite activity in a proper way. Without wanting to detract in
> any way from the excellent birds available today, many of us feel that without
> a HEO you can't do serious satellite work.
> Now, I keep wondering how is it possible that so little is known of the status
> of such a strategically important project. AMSAT-DL produces nice information
> bullettins... perhaps twice a year!
> I, and I suspect very many others, are extremely eager to know what's happening
> with the construction of the various modules, the challenges the team is
> encoutering and how they overcome difficulties. And, especially, I am dying
> to have an idea about timing. Schedule for completion of the construction,
> testing, and finally a possible window for launch. I would like to hear about
> such things often, perhaps on a monthly basis and if possible even more often.
> Such information doesn't need to be fancily formatted or in Sheakespeare-level
> literary English. A few "executive-style" paragraphs published perhaps on
> this BB every two weeks would go a VERY long way in keeping the enthusiasm
> and expectation alive.
> Deadlines keep being pushed and are at times unpredicable? I believe it is
> absolutely normal and there's nothing to be ashamed of in telling us just
> that. But please, DO TELL US. 
> And then there is the issue of funding. I remember a very similar discussion
> on this BB, which led to the welcome creation of the AO51 "thermometer".
> How is it possible - I ask myself - that the community is asked to contribute
> to what is likely to be an extremely costly project without knowing a thing
> about its budget and current status of funding? What are we contributing
> to? What are the shortcomings? Please make the community understand - in
> detail - in what ways funding is critical. Do create a direct link between
> somebody's desire to have a big bird up in the sky and his/her wallet.
> Keep up the fantastic job, AMSAT-DL (and non-DL contributors...), but please
> Thanks for reading and 73,
> Piero HB9DSU

Hello Piero,

Have you actually read the informations on the amsat Germany website? 
Well, If a take a look at the articles there, I find tons of interesting 
Information. And even more interesting stuff in the Amsat Germany 
Journal, you will receive if you are member. You are supporting the 
Organisations who bring you these fine toys, aren't you?

--> http://www.amsat-dl.org/p3e/

73, Luc

> *** Music, ham radio and more - http://www.qsl.net/hb9dsu ***
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org