[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: LONG and long overdue report
Ooohhh ... this is all very very cool. The SDR stuff is something I
have always wanted to play with. I suppose I'll have to stop waiting
and do something about it. <grin>
-Freeman, N5FPP
On Jul 23, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Robert McGwier wrote:
> Apologies to my colleagues and expect to see much more from all the
> participants in upcoming journals and meetings.
> *
>
> There has been work going on that has not been adequately described
> anywhere and I take the blame for that. I have been spending
> engineering money on your behalf. Let me summarize it for you and
> apologize for the length of this note. If I include technical
> details here, it would be much too long and articles for the
> journal will follow this short report. Frank Brickle, AB2KT, and I
> have been involved with Flex Radio doing the digital signal
> processing code for the SDR-1000 for almost 2 years. Frank and I
> are doing this as volunteers for Flex and I am doing it
> professionally for my employer who has myriad uses for this
> technology and software. Frank and I have no formal relationship
> with Flex and our work has been entirely voluntary. We have
> insisted that all work proceed under the GPL, but we did not have
> to work hard at this insistence since Gerald, K5SDR, is a clear
> believer. Please visit
>
> http://www.flex-radio.com
>
> and
>
> http://dttsp.sourceforge.net
>
> for full details and the code.
>
> When asked to join the Eagle design conference, I attended with the
> idea that I would give a few ideas, listen to a few ideas, get some
> ideas, and then go home and go back to sleep. I should know
> myself better by now. It became clear that the same old arguments
> would be presented stating we simply cannot live without Mode B.
> It was clear that we would have to give up significant territory in
> the spacecraft and power budget for anything that would interest me
> personally. I wanted to jump all over CC Rider, which is a 5650
> MHz uplink and 5850 MHz downlink transponder. This was another
> terrific Tom Clark (W3IWI) idea and it captured my interest.
>
> ftp://ftp.cnssys.com/pub/amsat/cc_amsat.pdf
>
> and
>
> ftp://ftp.cnssys.com/pub/amsat/cc-revisited.pdf
>
> It would give us our first satellite presence in these two bands
> and would provide us with some interesting technology and
> engineering and theoretical development issues to resolve. It
> would be a new educational prod to our users to learn and do
> something new. So I opened my mouth and said that I would be more
> than happy to "write" a software defined transponder for all of the
> normal "narrow band" transponders if and only if, CC Rider would
> be given 100% access to the power budget and always operational
> when it could be aimed at the earth. I would never consider
> supporting a RUDAK type mission where lots of work would be done
> and almost nothing ever done to use it. In fact, I claimed that
> all transponders could be, and likely should be, software defined
> radios. The spacecraft mechanical design and analysis shone at
> this meeting gave sufficient power budget to meet the design goal
> of 100% Mode B or Mode LS and 100% CC Rider simultaneously. We
> would have to constrain the CC Rider bandwidth to do all we wanted
> to do and allow small antennas on the ground but it would still be
> very interesting indeed.
>
> That landed me in hot water. The group put me in charge of the
> transponders period. This has begun to bear fruit. Frank and I
> have been building a working 48 Khz transponder for Mode B and
> Mode A. It is done using SDR-1000's and transverters and a Mini-
> ITX computer. THIS IS A PROTOTYPE. However, what can be done is
> pretty spectacular. Swapping between Mode's A and B is quite easy
> with this equipment. That said, this is not your father's Mode B
> and Mode A. We can have a three FM receivers and transmitters on
> one side of the beacon (which is in the center) and fully linear
> above the beacon. We implement Leila in DSP and even loud AMSAT
> lovers from southern Europe could not be louder than the beacon by
> more than 3 dB no matter how many megawatts EIRP they transmit.
> Even better, pileup participants will be shoved down to the noise
> floor where none of the emitters would be audible and good behavior
> would be strictly enforced since the sum of the people on the same
> frequency will be limited to 3 dB above the beacon!
>
> If we got tired of this configuration, we could turn it into
> several digital transponders or FILL IN THE BLANK, by simply
> changing the DSP configuration. Frank and I have made that very
> easy to do in our system. We will likely have to do some serious
> experimentation with processors to find the suitable one to carry
> the load and not need half the power budget but it is a great
> challenge and one I relish. What was it Tom and I used to say?
> "It's only software!" Indeed it is and the nicest thing is, most
> of the software already exists (for a change). This MODE B AND MODE
> A TRANSPONDER WILL BE DEMONSTRATED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IN
> LOUISIANA. Once we decide on the politics and legalities of where
> to place the transmitter and receiver bands, we will announce what
> equipment to bring. Please bring your G3RUH PSK demodulator and
> decoder software to see the M blocks coming your way.
>
> Recently, Frank and I joined the Gnu Radio "family" and I own (and
> so does AMSAT) the Gnu Radio project's Universal Software Radio
> Peripheral (USRP).
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/
>
> and
>
> http://www.ettus.com/
>
> John Stephensen, KD6OZH, has kindly donated two of his DCP-1's and
> we are building them up to use as well for our experiments. With
> his OFDM modem, we can even start transmitting the digital signals
> of interest to us in this transponder or utilize that structure in
> a modified way for the ground stations. These units
>
> http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/020910qex041.pdf
>
> These two units, USRP and DCP-1, are FPGA based engines. We are
> planning on running several design experiments on these units.
> Matt Ettus, N2JMI has given us a receiver for L band and will be
> doing the same for an S band transmitter. We can program the unit,
> using the same prototyping system that will run the Mode B
> transponder prototype, to do a few hundred KHz wide LS
> transponder. If we get the parts and can get some minor control
> going, it will be very easy to run a transponder on the USRP. THIS
> IS A PROTOTYPING EXPERIMENT. Again, we are going to have to
> carefully size our needs to have a possible power budget for the
> processing needed to put this transponder on the air as the USRP in
> its current form, takes 10 watts to do the job. For the initial CC
> Rider concept, we have a difficult task. We are proposing to use
> patch antennas with several small transmitters and preamps at the
> antenna and phasing these to be Nadir pointing. The USRP is
> uniquely qualified to enable these experiments. It has four
> receiver and four transmitter ports. We could do our phasing
> experiments using these ports. If this does not work out, and it
> is the riskiest part of the CC Rider concept, we can fall back to
> traditional gain antennas but it will limit the utility of this
> transponder to near-apogee and when nadir pointing. Tom Clark found
> an interesting part for 5 Ghz that looks promising. It is the
> Hittite 1 watt linear amplifier (HCM408LP3) and we have two
> evaluation modules to get a clear idea of the operational
> characteristics at differing power levels. This would be important
> if we wish to allow for side lobe tapering by use of a scaling on
> some of the elements in the phased array.
>
> Frank, Tom Clark, Rick Hambly, and I have been having regular
> meetings in Rick's lab. These experiments are proceeding and with
> some of these results, we will be calling together several people
> to try to get them to participate in our ambitious projects.
>
> Expect to hear more and see more in the journal as we continue this
> work and we pick up the pace in anticipation of the annual meeting.
>
>
> A new IHU for Phase 3 E and AMSAT Eagle
>
> Recently we have begun preparing the new integrated housekeeping
> unit for Phase 3E and AMSAT Eagle. Lyle Johnson and Chuck Green
> have done a great job in designing and getting it getting it ready
> for testing and ready to accept IPS, the standard spacecraft
> operating system originated by Karl Meinzer, DJ4ZC. Karl was
> heavily involved in the design of the watchdog system and the
> overall architecture. He has asked that we work on a software
> defined receiver utilizing a very powerful forward error correcting
> code and that it be run on the IHU-3. If this is successful and
> proves reliable on P3E, it will be the primary link to the
> ambitious P5A Mars mission Karl is leading.
>
> Yesterday the test code suite came up and ran on the IHU.
> Immediately after finalizing that and getting it to Stacey Mills,
> who will be doing radiation testing for us, we will begin putting
> IPS on it. Expect to see the development model running this code
> at the annual meeting and expect to see an article by several folks
> with Lyle and Chuck taking the lead on that.
>
> Thank you for reading and for your continued support of AMSAT.
>
> 73's
> Bob
> N4HY
> *
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>
-Freeman
"If you are going through hell, keep going."
-- Sir Winston Churchill
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home