[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Re: Galileo project.

1260-1300 MHz was a battle that was lost a couple of years ago.

It is inevitable that in 5 years time when the system is fully operational 
we will see a proliferation of receivers for Galileo when that time comes 
I'm sure there will be an impact on Amateurs being able to transmit between 
1260-1300. An Amateur transmitting in this band will block any Galileo 
receivers in the vicinity. Since "safety critical" uses for Galileo will be 
developed protecting the receivers will inevitably have precidence over 
Amateur operation.

We may need to consider getting replacement spectrum for the Amateur 
Satellite Service in the 1200-1350 MHz region but that's not going to be 

73 Trevor M5AKA
Ofcom Information: http://www.g0mwt.org.uk/
Daily Amateur Radio RSS News Service: http://www.southgatearc.org/
Add News Service to your Website: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/index.htm
Add News Service to your PC: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/newsreader.htm
Upload Your News Items: http://www.southgatearc.org/news/your_news.htm

>From: G0MRF@aol.com
>To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo project.
>Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:58:45 EDT
>Hello Chris / Group (G3ltf for info)
>I'm sure we all wish SSTL well with its continued expansion and involvement
>in  prestigious projects like Galileo.
>However, some caution is required as the Galileo project is not  without
>1) The projects E6 transmission channel is located between 1260 and  
>In 2003 the WARC made this an allocation with primary status and with no
>power flux density limits.
>The Galileo system uses spread spectrum and currently specifies a low
>overall power density at the Earths surface.  However I wonder what the  
>effect will
>be on the L band receivers of satellites like Eagle and P3E on  1269MHz as
>they pass close by the Galileo constellation at 23,600km?
>In close proximity the E6 transmissions will have some detrimental effect.
>They would certainly raise the noise floor and cause a higher power drain 
>the  transponders.
> >From the ESA site....
>"consists of 30 satellites (27 operational + 3 spares), positioned in three
>circular Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) planes at 23616 km altitude above the 
>  and at an inclination to the orbital planes of 56 degrees with reference 
>the  equatorial plane."
>2) There is a report that this is a joint project with China ($259m). Not
>universally popular.
>3) In the UK there has just been an announcement that our government is
>planning a road pricing scheme based on paying by the mile. Price dependant 
>time you drive and the route.  It is highly likely this will be one of the
>services provided by Galileo.
>So, I make that a rather smaller 'hooray'  from me.
>David   G0MRF
>In a message dated 11/06/2005 03:58:24 GMT Standard Time,
>owner-AMSAT-BB-digest@AMSAT.Org writes:
>From:  ChrisGW6KZZ@aol.com
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Fwd: [esa_general] Galileo test  satellites six months
>from launch
>Congratulations to Prof.Martin  Sweeting, Chris G7UPN/ZL2TPO and all at  
>on the new satellites  in development for ESA test bed version 2 satellites
>be built and  launched within six months.
>Details are now published on  the ESA  web site below:
>Good luck with  the launches and  
>Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org