[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Digital Voice



Woody 

Your original post made me thing you knew something about digital Voice
I apologize 

Joe  K0VTY
===================
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:20:29 -0400 "Woody" <kj4so@nc.rr.com> writes:
> NO!  That is NOT my point of view.  You really need to get a sense of 
> 
> humor and lighten up.
> Woody
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <k0vty@juno.com>
> To: <kj4so@nc.rr.com>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 1:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Digital Voice
> 
> 
> > Woody
> >
> > I think I might understand your point of view.
> >
> > " Do away with the ARRL international  DXCC program on HF
> > except on 160 meters and above 30 mHz ".
> >
> > I thought I asked a technical question.
> >
> > Please.
> >
> > Joe  K0VTY
> > ==========================
> > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:34:32 -0400 "Woody" <kj4so@nc.rr.com> 
> writes:
> >> Joe wrote:
> >> "Ten digital voice in a 20 meter pile up , how many get to make a 
> DX
> >> contact versus the same on SSB?"
> >>
> >>
> >> Actually Joe, 20 Meter pile ups are the best reason I can think 
> of
> >> for
> >> working 160M and VHF/UHF, & the microwave bands.  ;-)
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Woody
> >> KJ4SO
> >> AMSAT # 5562
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: <k0vty@juno.com>
> >> To: <kf4otn@ericsatcom.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:44 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Digital Voice
> >>
> >>
> >> >A question for your idle moments
> >> >
> >> > Ten digital voice in a 20 meter pile up , how many get to make 
> a
> >> DX
> >> > contact versus the same on SSB?
> >> >
> >> > Joe  K0VTY
> >> > ============================
> >> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:58:06 -0400 "Eric Christensen"
> >> > <kf4otn@ericsatcom.net> writes:
> >> >> Well, I haven't tried digital voice in the ham bands...  I'm
> >> sitting
> >> >> here at Radio NAM working on the big birds and realized that 
> I've
> >> >> been doing digital voice and data, both at various speeds, 
> and
> >> >> wondered if anyone was doing something similar to this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Doppler shift is easily controllable with software and radio
> >> >> control.
> >> >> If you are using your computer for your voice compression 
> then
> >> you
> >> >> can also have it control the Doppler on your radio.  The HEOs
> >> would
> >> >> be easier but it would be nice to still have software to 
> control
> >> the
> >> >> radio to keep your radios set to the same frequency as seen 
> at
> >> the
> >> >> sat (The One True Rule).
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm just thinking about how much stuff we could put into one 
> pass
> >> >> band if we used digital versus analog...
> >> >>
> >> >> Just thinking out loud...
> >> >>
> >> >> Eric KF4OTN
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Walter Holmes [mailto:walterh@k5wh.net]
> >> >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:02
> >> >> To: 'Eric Christensen, KF4OTN'
> >> >> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Digital Voice
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey Eric,
> >> >>
> >> >>  I just installed the Windrm software last weekend, and have 
> been
> >> >> trying to find stations on HF, with no luck so far. But I 
> would
> >> like
> >> >> to understand if you have been using something like that so 
> far.
> >> Or
> >> >> perhaps a different program. Guess I'm too cheap to try a
> >> hardware
> >> >> solution. :)
> >> >>
> >> >> I haven't considered using it on the birds, because of the
> >> extreme
> >> >> Doppler shift on the leos. Perhaps when the HEOs get up there
> >> that
> >> >> might be a lot different.
> >> >>
> >> >> Take care,
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Walter/K5WH
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: owner-AMSAT-BB@amsat.org 
> [mailto:owner-AMSAT-BB@amsat.org]
> >> On
> >> >> Behalf Of Eric Christensen, KF4OTN
> >> >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:59 AM
> >> >> To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> >> >> Subject: [amsat-bb] Digital Voice
> >> >>
> >> >> Has anyone tried digital voice on any of the birds, yet?  If 
> so,
> >> >> what
> >> >> protocol are you using and what are your results?
> >> >>
> >> >> 73s,
> >> >> Eric KF4OTN
> >> >> t.org
> >> >> http://www.ericsatcom.net
> >> >>
> >> >> Project OSCAR Member
> >> >> AMSAT-NA Member: 35360
> >> >> AMSAT Eastern North Carolina Area Coordinator
> >> >> ----
> >> >> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of 
> the
> >> >> author.
> >> >> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur 
> satellite
> >> >> program!
> >> >> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to
> >> Majordomo@amsat.org
> >> >> ----
> >> >> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of 
> the
> >> >> author.
> >> >> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur 
> satellite
> >> >> program!
> >> >> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to
> >> Majordomo@amsat.org
> >> > ----
> >> > Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of 
> the
> >> > author.
> >> > Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> >> > program!
> >> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to 
> Majordomo@amsat.org
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> >> author.
> >> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> >> program!
> >> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to 
> Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home