[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: P3E question
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] P3E question
- From: Andrew Harris <andrew.unit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:15:30 -0400
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UuXU1BAlM2aFkr82So7ooglAKrJbktVcPC5KsSnZ/N2fKialGrG7FkUatI8QY9hoJGvclJhYDNKsxMF6QIxeuKnKYPMrsCTFWYIZeXkq6RTeQv/X0nHxXQi7C6EMobut0Xv/amzngksl8eatwNG1qPYDyEPCePvyCZOgtMjs63U=
- In-Reply-To: <4296762A.9030302@comcast.net>
Hi Robert,
I read the paper "To Mars with P5-A" by Karl Meinzer after hearing
about P5A only a few days ago. It seems that from that paper, an
amateur station with a 2m antenna could possibly pick up data from P5A
in certain cases.
How does the use of a patented turbo coding scheme affect the
amateur population in general; does a blanket no-cost license
agreement apply to all amateur radio operators?
thanks,
-andrew
On 5/26/05, Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@comcast.net> wrote:
> P5A is in need of an extremely robust link. As such, we have access to
> a patented French telecom
> turbo code, license and all, for use on these missions. The try out is
> on P3E where we have to get it
> running, debugged, robust, etc. before it is used in P5 to Mars.
>
> Bob
> N4HY
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home