[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: In-Kind Services
On 23 Mar 2005 at 17:39, Gunther Meisse wrote:
> I thought it appropriate that I comment on the thread that has been
> circulating on the -bb regarding the "In-Kind Services".
> Just to set the record straight: The inclusion of In-Kind Services
on our
> operating statement does not effect the bottom line at all. All
those valued
> services are posted as "credits" to the Income side of the
statement and an
> equal and offsetting "debit" amount is either posted to an Expense
account
> or capitalized on the Balance Sheet and then expensed on the
expense side of
> the operating statement.. With other words, the transaction is a
wash...
> The purpose of the In-Kind tabulations and inclusions is to
illustrate to
> outsiders, and members, the amount of work that is being donated to
AMSAT in
> the course of executing our Program of Work. It gives a better
overall
> picture of the scope of our endeavor.
> This practice is perfectively acceptable under "Generally Accepted
> Accounting Practice" and is often done by many organizations.
Thank's Gunther
I do some reverse calculus from page 3 on 2003 financial report base
on what you said above.
I take out all the functional expenses and i got 346859$ exactly the
total on page 11. i do the same for the revenue section lets called
it "functionnal revenue" and i got 408336$ subtracting on by the
other i got a gain of 61477$ and it seems to be very close from the
statements of cash flow figures on page 4.
Bottom line am i correct if i say the 61477$ is not too far away from
the truth?
Suggestion
As a casual financial statements reader and for the sake of clarity
and ease to read i suggest you to added as written in the 2003 annual
report page 10 and 11 the same type of financial revenue expenses
statement. Its clear, simple, quick to read and this will avoid
misinterpretations. No need to make it audited only put it as an
explaining note report.
Keep this new way of reporting AMSAT finance if you still feel it is
useful but a simple note saying you evaluated the "in kind" services
to an XYZ amount will be much better than adding it on one side and
subtracting it on the other side of the statement sheet.
Why complicated simple things?
"-"
Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Coordonnateur AMSAT Quebec coordonnator
AMSAT 33583
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home