[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: ECHO reception

Hello drew- why are you being so confrontational?
Last I heard, ECHO also runs 500 mw.
I guess we both made our points.
I'll let you have the last word.
73, pat

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:

> Pat,
> I read perfectly well. For the most part you are comparing apples and oranges between AO-51 and ISS or MIR. ISS and MIR both were either on 145 Mhz and/or SIGNIFICANTLY more power. AO-27 only runs 500mW, if you cannot hear Echo at 1 watt then there is a  problem on your end. Either that radio doesn't receive as well at 435.3 compared to 436.8, you have local interference, or some other issue. The fact remains, with hundreds of operators experiences backing this up, that that antenna is about the worst thing you can use for satellite communications. 
> Continous whining about the power levels does absolutely nothing to change your situation. Echo could run 6 watts if the command team wanted to burn the batteries up in 2 years. They don't, and you shouldn't want them to. Many on this list have offered good advice on how to inexpensively improve your reception. Why do you insist on ignoring it?
> 73, Drew KO4MA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McGrane <tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
> Sent: Mar 12, 2005 11:59 AM
> To: Andrew Glasbrenner Cc: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ECHO reception
> Hello drew- I have been using this antenna for years with MIR and ISS and
> most recently with ECHO. When ECHO was transmitting 2 watts , I had great
> reception, even below 3 degrees to east. All are LEO's and my experience
> substantiates my observation. I hear ao-27 better at comparable angles and
> downlink powers. I write carefully; please read carefully. 73, pat
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org