[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Problems with the Kenwood TS-2000 for satellite work
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Problems with the Kenwood TS-2000 for satellite work
- From: "Cris David Salanga \(KG6VFX\)" <KG6VFX@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:27:49 -0800
Hi all,
I just wanted to mention how I was able to solve some problems using a
Kenwood TS-2000 for satellite work. Now, I started working satellites about a
month ago, so I'm still pretty green. I started with an Arrow II beam and a
Yaesu VX-7R HT, from that point I was hooked! I researched different rigs and
decided on the purchase of the Kenwood TS-2000 based on the the reviews of it
on eham.net. What I later learned is that the rig has a birdie (internal
beat) on 436.799MHz (+/- 10kHz). This makes the rig deaf for AO-27 and SO-50
until the doppler corrected frequency gets down to about 436.791MHz. I was
pretty bummed out when I learned this. The TS-2000 also does not allow you
program a PL tone while it is in "satellite" mode and using the trace function
in "satellite" mode incorrectly shifts the uplink frequency by an excessive
magnitude.
SOLUTIONS:
I really liked the TS-2000 and decided that instead of returning it for a
Yaesu FT-847, I would get a Yaesu FT-817ND to use as a separate reciever. I
chose the FT817 because it can also be controlled by WiSP and Orbitron. This
solved the birdie problem for AO-27 and SO-50. Incidentally, I found that if
I put the sub band into memory mode, put the main band in VFO mode, I could
program a PL for the uplink frequency and still retain doppler correction via
WiSP. This solves the PL tone issue for AO-51 and SO-50. In order for this
to work, you have to configure WiSP to use a separate rig for the downlink.
This prevents the TS-2000 from entering "satellite" mode while WiSP corrects
doppler.
I hope this helps anybody with a TS-2000. I contacted Kenwood and
received "canned" email responses regarding the PL tone issue and the doppler
shift magnitude issue. I don't believe they intend to resolve these anytime
soon.
Has anybody else figured this out?
73 de kg6vfx
Cris
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home