[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: FT-50 full duplex - was: Handheld for Echo and FM Sats?
I have my FT-50 sitting here with me. I am looking at the frequencies I
have programmed into the rig for AO-27. There are five of them, per my
post from yesterday. I have an observation that might be a clue as to why
your rig isn't allowing you to hear your downlink.
When I go through the menus, looking at ALL the settings for AO 1, I find:
SQL 0
TXPO HI
RPTR DUP This may be the key. The upper right of the screen also
has a black -+
It won't let me change it either! I think because it
contains a non-standard split.
SHFT Not changeable!
VDUP Off
RPTL off
RESM 5
SCNL off
APO off Automatic Repeater Offset (may be critical)
WSQL 0 Not changeable!
AMOD on
RMOD N-FM
Now all of my repeater entries have very different settings, and my simplex
entries have other very different settings. Once I had these working I
"copied" each entry over and over, changing frequency and name tag for
several other entries, including a set of five for SO-35.
Try these settings and post back here your results.
73, Mike kf4fdj
At 10:10 AM 7/9/2004, Mike Gilchrist wrote:
>John:
>
>You may have a point. My serial number is 7F201614. I have the keyboard
>addition which adds DVR, and maybe the key is here: I did the mod which
>opens up the transmit/receive range.
>
>At one time I had a 70 cm repeater on the tower at my job. The fellow who
>built the repeater had a 2 M repeater which we used to link to mine. He
>would use the 2 M input and listen on my 70 cm output. I would talk on
>the 70 cm input and listen on his 2 M output. I have sat for hours in my
>living room talking to him *FULL DUPLEX* using my FT-50. We could key
>down and *BOTH* of us could interrupt each other at will. We talked that
>way regularly.
>
>Now when you are programming those frequencies, make sure you turn off any
>repeater offset! You have to make sure you program simplex frequencies
>into the slot. If you don't, you might have the receiver, which is still
>working as you transmit, listening to another frequency other than one
>which you have set up in your test. Maybe you still don't have the rig
>set up properly?
>
>I've done countless demos on the easy sats using my FT-50. Maybe I DO
>have a spook radio, but it DOES function as a full duplex rig.
>
>At 09:30 AM 7/9/2004, John P. Toscano wrote:
>>Mike, it appears that YOUR Yaesu FT-50r doesn't work like MY Yaesu FT-50r
>>(or some other folks' FT-50r's). Mine is an older model, was originally
>>an FT-50r and had the upgrade to FT-50rd done later (replacement keypad
>>which added new tone and voice recording abilities), and it has the old
>>firmware that is reportedly able to be more easily "freebanded" (though I
>>never even tried that trick).
>>
>>Anyway, just to make sure, I programmed a UHF receive / VHF transmit pair
>>into memory 96 just like you described. Of course, I had no trouble
>>doing that, I've always known the radio could do that, as I have some
>>memory channels programmed like that for debugging our local VHF repeater
>>via its UHF remote link frequencies. **BUT** I then tuned my FT-847 to
>>the programmed UHF reception frequency of the FT-50r, confirmed that when
>>I keyed up the '847 that the '50r could hear it without trouble, and then
>>keyed up the '50r. NO MORE RECEPTION on UHF while the '50r was
>>transmitting on VHF. My FT-50r simply stops receiving while it is
>>transmitting. BTW, this is identical to my experience with the repeater
>>setup. I transmit on UHF, the local repeater hears me on the UHF link
>>and re-transmits me on VHF, but I don't hear my own signal on VHF, I only
>>hear the repeater courtesy beep when I unkey. This is completely
>>different from what happens with the FT-847 or FT-5100, where I do hear
>>my VHF signal while I talk on UHF.
>>
>>So if your FT-50r can do this trick, congratulations to you, or too bad
>>for me. Maybe we need to compile a list of serial numbers that DO and
>>DON'T operate this way, to see if we can figure out where the change
>>occurred (if it is a firmware issue). Mine is 6K112044. Sorry if I
>>contributed to any aggravation on your part, that was never my intention.
>
>
>----
>Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home