[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: UTC nastygram on BPL



Thanks, Art.

RE: "All the field trials over the years in various parts of the country
have shown that the risk of interference from BPL is extraordinarily low,
because it produces only
minimal radio frequency energy at a few points in the system".

Now we know where Baghdad Bob is working.  :-)

73,

Woody
KJ4SO

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arthur H Feller" <afeller@ieee.org>
To: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] UTC nastygram on BPL


>
http://www.uplc.utc.org/?cbr_v=dcb&nt=true&cbr_eid=25276&p=admin&ct=contentbrowser
>
>
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home