[amsat-bb] qha article in the may/june journal

[Wallace Strom <kg4yuw@xxxxxxxx>]

I have a question about the qha article - it seem that the big bifilar
is inside the small bifilar.  How can this be when the length of the big
bifilar is .260 of a wave length and the small bifilar is .238 of a wave
length?  In the satellite handbook, fig 10-17 when combined with table
10.6 depicts the same set up.

73,

Wally
kg4yuw


----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org