[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Threats from VA3LK (Larry Kayser)

I will probably have to put on my asbestos coat for this one, but here

1) I do not see anything that I interpret as a "threat", except one to
fight for what he believes in, which he is free to do. Supporting
something sometimes means that you have to deal with people that oppose
it. If this is a problem then perhaps you should reconsider your
willingness to support something publicly.
2) I see no invasion of privacy. Sending an e-mail does not mean someone
invades your privacy, weather you want it or not. Try telling the
mailman to stop brining you letters from your ex because you don't want
to read them....
4) The idea of reporting this as "spam" is dead wrong. It is not
unsolicited commercial mail, it is an AMSAT member writing someone else
within AMSAT to voice their opinion. And the members response is to
block it?

I have to ask if there is any truth to what he is accusing OSCAR VII and
X of. He at least seems to have his facts/information together and I see
no rebuttal to any of this beyond "Get your own site".

I also notice that he is quoted but the replies are not. Which means
that we really don't know what is going on here.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Clarke [mailto:w0eec@AMSAT.Org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 5:15 PM
To: amsat
Subject: [amsat-bb] Threats from VA3LK (Larry Kayser)

I recently received this email from VA3LK:

>I was just looking around and found your web site on the return of 
>OSCAR VII.  This is a direct request of you to include the following in

>your web page.
>"Not everyone is happy to see the return of AMSAT OSCAR VII.  AMSAT 
>VII now joins AMSAT OSCAR X as a very long time radio pollution
>that could last for the next 100 years or so.  This pollution is
>by the uncontrolled and random operation of radio transmitters on three

>amateur radio bands, on every orbit.
>AMSAT OSCAR VII functions in irrefutable violation of the license
>agreement between AMSAT and the FCC - AMSAT consistently makes no
>to begin the long process of mitigating the operation of AMSAT OSCAR
>Larry Kayser
>AMSAT Life Member #3
>Builder of the 435.1 Beacon on AMSAT OSCAR VII"
>If you take from this that I see AMSAT as a disgrace to amateur radio,
>your right.

When I wrote him back to ask for an explanation he wrote the following 
somewhat threatening email:

>Pollute, destroy the purity or outrage the sanctity of
>AMSAT OACAR VII transmits uncontrollably on up to three amateur bands,
>randomly, every time it crosses the terminator from dark to light.  The

>beacons transmit information of no value, the passbands contain
>signals, and badly distorted signals that may appear in the input 
>passbands, and it does this on every orbit around the earth.
>AMSAT has an FCC license that prohibits this uncontrolled and unmanaged
>form of operation of AMSAT OSCAR VII.
>AMSAT took on a fiduciary responsibility to use and by implication 
>and protect every radio frequency AMSAT makes use of.  AMSAT also has
>responsibility to clean up any mess made by AMSAT satellites.
>Think back to the early Sputniks.  If they were transmitting on the 20 
>WWV and WWVH frequencies, as they once did, the Russians would be
>heat from the world wide communities to clean up the mess.  AMSAT
>take no less, and AMSAT is messing up many more frequencies (aka 
>bandwidth) than the Russians ever did.
>Is the message now clear?

After I advised him that I wasn't in any position to do anything for
and advised him to take his argument to his peers, he wrote yet another 
threatening letter:

>I started to prepare a detailed reply to you, respecting you but 
>the simple facts before you.  Then I came to this paragraph in your
>and realized there is a simple solution to this discourse.
> > Please - if you truly feel this way put up your own website to 
> > express
> your
> > anger, argue it out with your peers or take legal action.  Please 
> > don't trouble me with it.  I'm just a computer programmer who enjoys

> > AO-7 being what it is - an enjoyable satellite.
>The minute that you put up your web site supporting AO7 you lost your
>right to privacy and you became a public person.  I have every right to

>take your public person and use it as I wish to advance the case that
>is now a public polluter and you are part of the amunition - you made
>choice to be a public person and you lost the right to your privacy
>you did so.  You can not have it both ways, things don't work like
>Either shut down your web site, or put up with the poltical action.  

So for some reason he's decided to try to make this personal and invade
privacy (as if I had any to invade in the first place.)

Has anyone had to deal with these kinds of threats from him before, and
so, have you had any success other than in the courts?  I've contacted
attorney and he thinks the guy is just some kind of nut or something and

told me to ignore him.

Any advice from the membership?



W0EEC - CM87tm
AMSAT Area Coordinator - San Francisco Bay Area
http://www.projectoscar.net    http://www.PlanetEmily.com 

Help Launch Echo - http://www.amsat.org/amsat/sats/echo/index.html

Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org