[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Idea for more satellites in short time



That`s why i leave the building of sat`s to you and William...

I still think we could have a new kind of qso`s with a system like that.
In `hop` mode the SAT`s are like `opperators`.
The proberbly nessesary delay demands some smart ,
and patient opperating of the user`s.
Still..... maybe , i don`t know.
In my imagination i hear me and some others using a duo like that,
and having at least a lot of fun...

Chris PA5RWE

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Idea for more satellites in short time


> >>> "Chris" <pa5rwe@AMSAT.Org> said:
> 
> >But if i have to design a new sat , it would build a double replica of
> UO-14
> >with the equipment to let them work together , so that we could
> `sathop` in
> >FM.
> 
> As everyone knows, I am not opposed to FM at all.  
> But the above Idea has such a vanishingly small probability 
> of success that the return on investment is so close to zero
> as to be invisibile...  Its like trying to work UO-14 with
> only 1 watt on a rubber duck IN THE BLIND...
> 
> Bob
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home