[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
AM on sats
- Subject: [amsat-bb] AM on sats
- From: "G8IFF/KC8NHF Nigel A. Gunn" <nigel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:01:24 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <40204852.DB4396FB@kcbx.net>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
Why not? What's wrong with AM apart from power efficiency?
Cliff Buttschardt wrote:
>AM on ham satellites???? Good god no!!!! Cliff K7RR
>
>
>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Nigel A. Gunn. 59 Beadlemead, Milton Keynes, MK6 4HF, England.
Tel +44 (0)1908 604044 or 07774 478270 (mobile)
e-mail nigel@ngunn.net http://www.ngunn.net/cyberworld
Amateur radio stations G8IFF, KC8NHF
Member of AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK #182, ARRL, QRPARCI #11644,
Flying Pigs #385, Dayton ARA #2128, Milton Keynes ARC, GQRP #11396
Supporter of MK Lightning and Dayton Bombers Ice Hockey Teams
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home