Re: [amsat-bb] AO40rcv FEC version

["Rick Fletcher, KG6IAL" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I noticed a slight reduction (5-7%) in the number of good-CRC standard
blocks in the late version(s) of FEC-enabled AO40RCV but dismissed it as the
capture rate was still in excess of 85%.

Rick, KG6IAL
www.teksharp.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Grohmann" <Chris.Grohmann@globecast.com>
To: "amsat-bb@amsat.org" <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:27 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO40rcv FEC version


> A while back I posted a message commenting that it seemed to me that the
ability of the newer FEC versions of AO40rcv to decode the standard blocks
seems to be worse than the older non-FEC versions. A couple of other people
replied agreeing with that view, but I don't recall seeing anything further.
Is everybody else who uses the updated AO40rcv getting good recovery of both
types of block - assuming good signal strength?
>
> Sorry - I don't know the answers to the other recent AO40rcv questions
either.
>
> 73's Chris G4SDG
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>


----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org