Re: [amsat-bb] 2.4 GHz wireless network interference to AO-40 station ??

[Emily Clarke <eec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not at all - I thought it was clear that it was intended to chase my 
neighbor away from those channels so they wouldn't interfere with AO-40, 
nothing more.

- Emily



At 08:40 AM 12/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>I sent the pointer to the graphic along because in your previous post
>you indicated that you had your 128-bit WEP enabled access point on
>channel 2, whilst trying to chase away another AP on channel 1.  This
>left me with the impression that you, like many people, don't realize
>that that channel allocations overlap.
>
>louie
>wa3ymh
>
> > Yes, well - it's a really nice graphic, but it I'm not interested in
> > setting up my 802.11 device - I want to have a clean signal on
> > AO-40.  You'll notice that Channel 1 is the closest to AO-40's 
> frequency in
> > 2401, so it's the most likely to cause interference.  I do have a 802.11B
> > device but it's on Channel 11 where it doesn't bother anything.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Emily
> >
> >
> >
> > At 04:57 PM 11/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >You should look at the channel allocation used for 2.4GHz DSSS 802.11
> > >devices.  Channel 2 overlaps channel 1.  The 3 non-overlapping
> > >channels for 802.11b (and presumably, 802.11g) use are 1, 6 and 11.
> > >
> > >See http://www.unixwiz.net/images/80211bchannels.gif for a nice
> > >pictorial summary of this.
> > >
> > >louie
> > >wa3ymh
> >
> > ----
> > Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org