[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: tuning on DXpeditions
Hi Jim,
I agree, the FT-736 CAT control is too primitive to be
useful on AO-40. QSYing with the keyboard isn't worth the
trouble. When the FT-847 first came out, it had the same
type of CAT interface and enough of us complained
to Yaesu that they actually fixed it!
If we ever get another mode A satellite, I know of at
least one ham who used his Kenwood TS-450 with his FT-736
and computer control and that worked pretty well since
you can do all the tuning and tweaking from the TS-450
in mode A.
73,
Tony AA2TX
---
At 08:44 PM 9/4/2003 -0700, Jim Walls wrote:
>Well, that is part of the reason I don't use computer control. My home
>satellite radio is a Yaesu FT-736. Now, I know some of you are saying
>"wait a minute, the 736 has CAT computer control". You are sort of
>right. What the 736 does not allow is for you to grab the VFO to move one
>of the bands, and have the computer adjust the other. You MUST use total
>computer control, and at least in my opinion, QSYing with a keyboard is a
>royal pain in the ass - and yes, I have done it. Also remember that the
>"one true rule" works great if EVERYONE in the conversation is using full
>doppler tuning. If any one person is manual, it becomes a real pain for
>either all the computer controlled people, or the manual person, or more
>likely both.
>
>73
>-----------------------
>Jim Walls - K6CCC
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home