[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: TZ6RD operation..



 Now let me disagree. the list system might be even a better idea for AO40
dx station. This would take into account all of my special situations. Like
the Bali dx station could just selectively listen for NA ones, or Two's, and
so on... IF he knew there was a short 20 minute window to these areas. I
don't think the list system is anywhere as obnoxious as the net system.
There is nothing  equally worse then the net system !

73 Jeff kb2m



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Francisco Costa" <fcosta@mail.telepac.pt>
To: "Jeffrey Griffin" <jeffrey.griffin@comcast.net>; <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] TZ6RD operation..


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeffrey Griffin <jeffrey.griffin@comcast.net>
> To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] TZ6RD operation..
>
>
> >   I like the split idea, and the by the numbers routine myself. Exactly
> what
> > you would use on HF in a pileup. Perhaps, by the numbers would be less
> > confusing for everyone involved.
>
> With all respect, allow me to desagree again.
> My HF experience teach me working by numbers, even working split,
> is the most anoying system (only surpassed by list/net system).
> Maybe on satellite will not be as bad as HF (the pile up will never
> be so big), but even so, as me is concern, I think the best system is
> Split with a rx window 5 to 10 up (more if needed, but never more
> than 15kHz wide). It's the only system that garanties a fair chance
> for everybody, and awards the ability (not the EIRP) of the Dx chaser.
> Of course, this system demands more work on the Dx operator side.
> That's why it's not so used...
>
> As TZ operation is concerned, I think Doud did a Fantastic job.
> Only a person with his patience would have take it so easy.
> I probably would have said "SPREAD OUT GUYS" :0)
> CU soon on AO-40
>
> 73 F.Costa, CT1EAT
> www.qsl.net/ct1eat
>
>
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home