[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Future Sats: L/U
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Future Sats: L/U
- From: sco@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:16:16 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <1a0.169a5b3e.2c222010@aol.com>
I think we should also have a S band downlink because all the new AO-40
users already have the S band downlink thing going. I would use L/U as
primary and L/S as seconday with U/V as a third level, on the power budget
plan. U/V would only get power if there were not enough users on the first
two levels to use all the power available or if one of those levels failed
for some reason (we would have U/V as a safety backup to the primary (L/U)
and secondary (L/S) payloads).
W4SCO
>Even Beter try U or L Up-link and V down link - EAGLE will most probably
>do this as a part of it's capability - I have always advocated Mode B for
>Eagle.
>73
>Robin Haighton VE3FRH
>President AMSAT
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home