[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Future Sats: L/U
On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 21:13 America/Chicago, Tony Langdon wrote:
> I'm inclined to be more interested in the digital approach. Could the
> power
> of a modern PC be harnessed to do the DSP side of a digital satellite
> comms
> system? How much/little hardware do we need? Something that requires
> a
> modest antenna, a bit of hardware and not require an octopus to drive
> (2
> VFOs, rotators - I'm not going to be one in a position to run auto
> everything for a number of years).
It certainly could. RUDAK was supposed to be sort of the precursor to
that, but it may or may not fully work. If I remember right, I think
Eagle was supposed to have a digital voice mode. Not sure if that's
still in it or not. But a digital signal would certainly help with
what you say. On the other hand, it would potentially scare some
people away as it would be "new" just like S band has.
Better yet, get a C band and X band transponder working (like was
planned on AO-40). Then you could use the same dish for
transmit/receive and it could be a DSS sized dish.
Anyhow, hope to hear you on AO-40 sometime, Tony!
73,
Jon
NA9D
-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
Citizen of the People's Democratic Republik of Illinois
Life Member: ARRL, NRA
Member: AMSAT, DXCC
Ham Radio Webpage: http://www.qsl.net/na9d <- Updated on 1/12/03!!!
Digital Photography Page:
http://homepage.mac.com/jogden/Photography.html
"It takes as much stress to be a success as it does to be a failure."
- Emilio James Trujillo
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home