[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: Repeater on the Moon or geosat

whilst everything Daniel says is correct, can I share a little fantasy of

Imagine a standardised AMSAT geosat payload that would only be activated
AFTER the main payload has died or been declared no longer required and when
the sats have been moved to their higher orbits.

The extra weight of the payload would still be there but might be simply an
equivalent to the balance weights that are no doubt actually required.

The potential QRM problem to the main payload would be overcome though.

I am not sure of what stabilisation is used when the birds are "parked" and
this would affect the antenna design but there would certainly kilowatts of
power available even allowing for the decay of the solar panel outputs after
years in space.

If we could "mass" produce these units and if we had a little patience to
wait a few years, we could maybe develop a fine constellation of amateur
satellites? No doubt one or two might even become available rather more
quickly than the builders/owners would wish.

If we could think up some positive PR/publicity for this concept then maybe
we convince the builders/owners that it would be a good idea. For instance
perhaps, earth imaging for crop disease fires etc, emergency comms facility
for future manned flights, emergency relay facilities for??? etc etc


Graham G3VZV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv@usa.net>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: 30 April 2003 18:01
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Repeater on the Moon


> Launches to geosynchronous orbit are almost always weight limited. The
> lifetime of a geosynchronous satellite in commercial service nearly always
> depends on its fuel supply which is used for station keeping in the
> geosynchronous orbit. When the satellite runs out of fuel it is retired to
> higher orbit. The owner of the commercial satellite, who is in business to
> make money, normally fills the fuel tanks with as much fuel as the launch
> vehicle can lift in order to insure a long life in revenue service. Any
> additional payload that piggy-backs along will reduce the fuel load and
> lifetime of the satellite. For this reason, a piggy-back ride to
> geosynchronous orbit seems to be unlikely.

Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org