Re: [amsat-bb] PB/PG under Linux v. PB/PG under MS-DOS

["John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@xxxxxxx>]

You have "return receipt requested" enabled on your mail program. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W8JSA" <w8jsa@exis.net>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] PB/PG under Linux v. PB/PG under MS-DOS


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> This not a question about which is better, DOS or Linux. I'm looking
> for options and opinions regard running PB/PG running two similar but
> different OS's. The computer will not have a GUI installed, meaning
> no Microsoft Windows or X-Windows. just command line. The reason is
> that this is a super low buck venture here. A 586 with 64M of ram.
> MS-DOS 6.22 is probably the best thing to come out of Redmond but I
> know of the stableness Linux is legendary. Does PB/PG run better
> under MS-DOS or Linux, or is it that there really isn't a difference
> between the two. Which is easier to install? To configure?
> 
> I would consider a X-Windows application but not MS-Windows because
> of security and stability concerns but would rather stick with the
> command line approach. Thanks and take care.
> 
> - --
> 73 DE JEFF W8JSA
> CHESAPEAKE VA
> 36*45'42.34"N 076*15'01.29"W
> UTM 18S 4069239N 0388394E WGS84
> FM16us
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use
> <http://www.pgp.com>
> 
> iQA/AwUBPnDq1zt+p1QVDqHaEQK3JQCfaxfp3usOve2k+zqN+lA7Y/hx0S4An0iP
> BruOwa6UQQoc12KYE2VuB4kz
> =9Ou5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> ----
> Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> 
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org