[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

PB/PG under Linux v. PB/PG under MS-DOS



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This not a question about which is better, DOS or Linux. I'm looking
for options and opinions regard running PB/PG running two similar but
different OS's. The computer will not have a GUI installed, meaning
no Microsoft Windows or X-Windows. just command line. The reason is
that this is a super low buck venture here. A 586 with 64M of ram.
MS-DOS 6.22 is probably the best thing to come out of Redmond but I
know of the stableness Linux is legendary. Does PB/PG run better
under MS-DOS or Linux, or is it that there really isn't a difference
between the two. Which is easier to install? To configure?

I would consider a X-Windows application but not MS-Windows because
of security and stability concerns but would rather stick with the
command line approach. Thanks and take care.

- --
73 DE JEFF W8JSA
CHESAPEAKE VA
36*45'42.34"N 076*15'01.29"W
UTM 18S 4069239N 0388394E WGS84
FM16us

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPnDq1zt+p1QVDqHaEQK3JQCfaxfp3usOve2k+zqN+lA7Y/hx0S4An0iP
BruOwa6UQQoc12KYE2VuB4kz
=9Ou5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home