[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
ClearSpeech v. TS-2000
- Subject: [amsat-bb] ClearSpeech v. TS-2000
- From: K5OE@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:02:27 -0500
I carefully compared the files from Jon and Scott (thanks, guys) to the Noise Reduction 1 mode (SSB) on my TS-2000 and find:
- stronger signals, say 6 dB or more out of the noise, are about the same level of improvement... less background noise, improved clarity, but some slight compression and distortion to the audio.
- very weak signals, near the noise floor of the receiver, show better improvement on the ClearSpeech than on the Kenwood. In fact, I don't find the Kenwood NR1 to be helpful at all for very weak signals on SSB. It is just the opposite on CW using the Kenwood NR2 algorithm--as this one pulls out stuff I can't copy by ear. NR2 is too narrow for SSB.
My setup for NR1 on AO-40 (not the same as for HF):
- NR1 ON
- LOCUT filter 500 Hz (HF set to 200)
- HICUT filter 2400 Hz (HF set to 2000)
- RX EQUAl (menu 20) CONVEN
- AGC ON (set about mid-point)
My biggest question is: when will the sound card programs surpass these dedicated gadgets? My guess is within the next year. After all, this is not magic, but state-of-the-art programing using digital signal processing techniques. Just like objects in your rear view mirror, the software defined radios are closer than they appear :-)
73,
Jerry, K5OE
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home