[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Satellite control via Iridium?
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite control via Iridium?
- From: "Johann Lochner" <lochner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 19:09:04 +0100
Hi folks,
FIRST OF ALL, SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In Nov. 2000 and Jan. 2001 two solar-powered weather stations, built
by Ronald Ross, KE6JAB, and his team at Stanford, were deployed in
Antarctica. Originally SO-35 was used to relay data to the Internet
(real-time and store-and-forward), but after its demise the first
weather station could be reconfigured to digipeat via UO-22. Since
then the ZS7ANT station in Antarctica (designed as a control station
for SO-35) monitored the U0-22 downlink to provide a real-time feed
to the Internet and a daily log of all decoded data.
Data from the first station (which has so far survived two Antarctic
winters) is still received every day. Since it has no data relay,
the status of the second station is unknown. More information is at
<http://www.thistle.org/Wx2000/>.
In Dec. 2002 a third station was deployed at yet another Antarctic
location. Besides weather sensors, it has a webcam and an Iridium
modem to upload data to the Internet. UO-22 can still be used as a
backup relay. More information is at <http://www.thistle.org/ANI/>.
NOW MY QUESTION, BASED ON THE SUCCESS OF THE LATEST STATION:
How feasible is LEO satellite control via the Iridium or any other
existing satellite constellation?
Imagine being able to access your satellite wherever it is in its
orbit, at whatever time is convenient! Don't have any numbers yet,
but a quick comparison of LEO to earth-based operations led to the
following lists of differences:
DISADVANTAGES:
* May have higher doppler shift.
* Spotty coverage due to narrower beams at orbital height (but
remember the success of the AO-40 GPS experiments outside of
the GPS "shell").
ADVANTAGES:
* More satellites in view.
* Closer to Iridium "shell" (less path loss cancelling spotty
coverage to some degree).
Any additions to these lists or feedback on the importance of the
listed factors would be much appreciated.
73 de ZR1CBC, Johann.
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home