[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: receiving system design tradeoffs
on 2/5/03 7:21 PM, Frederick M. Spinner at fspinner@hotmail.com wrote:
> Your 23" G3RUH is at least a 6dB better setup than a BBQ, so my point still
> remains here. It's a money versus time versus mechanics
> issue.
Fred,
How is this the case?
I assume the following:
BBQ: 36" x 24"
Feed: Linear, dipole
G3RUH: 23" in diameter
Feed: CP, patch
At best, you should see a 3 dB improvement with the change from linear to
CP. I suppose you will also see some improvement as the pattern of the
patch is probably better than that of the dipole feed on the BBQ. The BBQ
should have a little more gain in the sense that it has more area than the
G3RUH.
So balance it out and I can't find where that extra 3 dB comes in.
Help.
Jon
-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
Citizen of the People's Democratic Republik of Illinois
Life Member: ARRL, NRA
Member: AMSAT, DXCC
http://www.qsl.net/na9d <- Updated on 1/22/03!!!
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home