[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: What can we do for NASA?
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] What can we do for NASA?
- From: "Robert Oler" <cvn65vf94@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 02:52:33 -0600
Hello John.
Up writing reports...but you have some interesting thoughts.
I've avoided the political things here (although I certianly have some
strong opinions on them) but I'll bite here.
Politics. Yeah its off topic and off bearing. You and I might disagree or
agree on war with Iraq, tax cuts, etc but they dont really effect Ham radio
in the least.
The Columbia disaster. I really dont think discussion of it is that far
off. Its being discussed pretty heavily nationwide right now (its even
invaded a plastic scale model group I frequent) because its a national
event. Probably the notion that AMSAT officials should refrain from voicing
their opinions as AMSAT officials is a good thing...but there are
implications to amateur payloads in space or on the station and so the
\shuttle/human spaceflights future is germane in my opinion.
The inspection idea. IF (and its a big IF...speculation is the first step
on a fools errand in kicking the tin of accident investigation) the tiles
are involved I agree a shuttle is never going to fly again unless there is
the capability to inspect the tiles before landing (and I would add to fix
them before landing).
Your idea is intriguing (and I am a big fan of picosats) but not only do I
doubt you could get the resolution necessary in a picosat to do an
inspection from what NASA considers a "safe distance" I doubt you could get
the data rates needed (although teh WiFi systems are intriguing). Whats
worse for your idea is that NASA is never going to put a critical system in
the hands of anyone or group other then "professional" bird builders.
The military has on the last GPS launch demonstrated such a system and NASA
is working already on a sort of "free flyer" (looks like a big basketball).
They would doubtless use either of those before turning to "amateur"
systems.
Finally I would add this. I find the attempt to integrate "amateur
satellite" operation into something other then "communications for hams"
entertaining.
I think your ideas are innovative but NASA is not going to go there.
Robert Oler WB5MZO
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
----
Sent via amsat-bb@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home