[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: [psk31] PSK31 Satellite Uplink on 10m (Bob Bruninga)



On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joseph Kasser wrote:

> Any novice or tech capable of psk31 and sat operation ought to be able
> to upgrade to a code free hf licence...
>
> if you really want to make it easy .. well where does it stop? Why not get rid
> of the ham licence need? Call it an educational citizens band ... there are
> frequencies there <grin>.
>
> So please keep the issue domestic, and not lower standards around the world.

I guess I dont follow your point.  We have Novice and Tech+ licensees
that can operate in 28.1 to 28.3 already.   How can designing a satellite
that they can use, be a lowering of standards?  And maybe I missed
something, but I didnt think we have any license class that has code-free
HF privliges.  And all Novice and Tech+ have passed a code test...
?

Bob, WB4APR


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Bruninga [mailto:bruninga@usna.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:25 PM
> To: Joseph Kasser
> Cc: 'psk31@bipt106.bi.ehu.es'
> Subject: RE: [psk31] PSK31 Satellite Uplink on 10m (Bob Bruninga)
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joseph Kasser wrote:
>
> > 1. Isn't that a domestic USA issue, not an international one? Why not
> > keep it domestic and ask for a waiver or a change to the US rules?
>
> Because trying to manage frequencies every 45 minutes on an orbit by
> orbit basis on a satellite with no central processor would be a
> nightmare.  Besides the IARU rules for oepration in the amateur satellite
> service wants to see satellites used by radio amateurs world wide..., not
> exclusive of one group or another...
>
> And...
> A change to rules or a waiver would take more effort and time than the
> entire life of this satellite from initiation of design to end of
> mission.. <grin>
>
>  de Wb4APR, Bob
>
> > >
> Joe > >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Bruninga [mailto:bruninga@usna.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:38 PM
> > To: Joseph Kasser
> > Cc: 'psk31@bipt106.bi.ehu.es'
> > Subject: Re: [psk31] PSK31 Satellite Uplink on 10m (Bob Bruninga)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joseph Kasser wrote:
> >
> > > There is a good case for a separate frequency, so why not use the
> > > portion of 10 meters that is already allocated for satellites?
> >
> > Because it excludes Novices and Tech+.  And the idea of this satelltie is
> > a "easy sat"///
> >
> > bob
> >
> >
> >
>
> de WB4APR@amsat.org, Bob
>
> PCsat WEB  page     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/pcsat.html
> ISS-APRS FAQ:       http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/iss-faq.html
> CUBESAT Designs     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/cubesat.html
> APRS LIVE pages     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
> APRS SATELLITES     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/astars.html
> MIM/Mic-E/Mic-Lite  http://www.toad.net/~wclement/bruninga/mic-lite.html
>
>

de WB4APR@amsat.org, Bob

PCsat WEB  page     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/pcsat.html
ISS-APRS FAQ:       http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/iss-faq.html
CUBESAT Designs     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/cubesat.html
APRS LIVE pages     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
APRS SATELLITES     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/astars.html
MIM/Mic-E/Mic-Lite  http://www.toad.net/~wclement/bruninga/mic-lite.html


----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home