[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Fiber Optics at RF
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Fiber Optics at RF
- From: Galen Watts <gwatts@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:29:03 -0400
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:05:47 -0700
> From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Fiber Optics at RF
> Fiber optics ... hard to shielded well because
> you need a hole to stick the cable into. We're talking signals in the
> microwave band here, typically. Also, check out the fiber cable itself.
> Some have a metal runner that goes along side the glass for protection,
> and others have a high graphite content in the jacket. Both can be
> problems with Rf fields.
I work at a radio observatory with a fiber computer network. Imagine
extending the 'hole to stick the cable into' out about a foot so it's a
tube and you have what we do to shield our network electronics' fiber
connections. It's a waveguide above cutoff, the smaller the diameter
the higher the cutoff. We typically get 60-90 dB of noise attenuation
out to 15+ GHz, and if one stuffs some copper wool in the end it'll cut
off out to 100+ GHz. We're trying to keep the RF in as opposed to out
but it works both ways and according to some of the most sensitive radio
reception equipment on the planet it works quite well. As for metal
runners and graphite jackets we have both in many places and it makes no
difference.
The network switch shielded enclosures look like little pipe organs with
orange and yellow vines growing out of 'em.
73!
Galen, W8LNA
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home