Re: [amsat-bb] Hello - anybody there ??

["Franco Borsa - hb9oab" <hb9oab@xxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@mindspring.com>


> [...] Just leave your transmit in one place
> and tune the receive to call cq or during a qso. From the sound of it you
> are just a little deaf on 70 cm. Listen for the beacoins at 435.795 +/-
> doppler. FO-20 is a solid tone, and FO-29 is telemetry. Check the
> connections, and consider a preamp, preferably mast mounted.

(sry english->TranslatorPro)
Uhmmmm...
this is the classical system that, even if recommended and used by different
sat-consumers, that it goes to disturb other people's QSO (even if activity
is least).
For a correct tuning of the satellite, me personally suggestion and big used
on all SAT for simplicity and functionality, to fix a Free frequency in DW
RX, therefore quickly to move in TX up to reach it.
The same thing that then it does him to reach a CQcall or qso's.
Then, to for instance fix on 847 the tracking, and to put the part TX on the
SUBVFO.
This way making a least correction her effects him in TX on the SUB-TUNE
(for "vfo" convenience) simple and effective way without going to disturb
with the move doopler, QSO or other QSO's people's.
Example: has not ever happened you to put to for instance call you on the
your free DOWNLINK to ~435850 and after an instant you feel yourself pass
above from a QSO that is going down without moving the TX? And even it is a
rare DXpedition or even a weak signal of one your personal skeed...

To my way of seeing, recommended or no, it is mostly reliable surely in the
Analogical satellites to move himself/herself/themselves in TX on the
UPLINK, while on the digital monocanales it is evident the move in DW in how
much your UPLINK in V can almost stay firm.

----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org