[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Thoughts on getting the satellite antennas back on line. . .
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Thoughts on getting the satellite antennas back on line. . .
- From: "Philip Berkowitz" <Philb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:09:32 -0400
John, UO-22 passes both personal and bbs traffic. The packet network is
still alive and well. Hopefully others will chime in with the status of the
other digital birds.
AO-10 comes back to life now and then and lately has been in eclipse when
viewable from the East Coast of the USA, (at least when I am awake!).
AO-40 downlinks at mainly at 2.4ghz with other bands still being tested. I
use a 2 foot BBQ dish on my boom with G-5400 roter and KLM 40cx and 22C
antennas without a problem.
Hope to catch you on the birds soon!
73 Phil
KA1YIQ
>HI Folks:
>
>Bearing in mind that I really don't have any interest in FM
>satellites or voice-based LEO's, what is left these days? Unless I'm
>reading the AMSAT webpage incorrectly, the only 9600 baud digital
>satellites left that are operational are UO-22 and perhaps MO-46. Can
this
>be correct? I can remember when UO-22 was basically reserved for BBS
>message forwarding. Now that BBS's are pretty much dead, has this
>satellite reverted to general amateur use? I tried listening to MO-46
>tonight, but did not detect any signal. Is there a community of folks
>still using 9600 baud store and forward or has the Internet largely
>displaced this as well? If such a group exists, on what satellites will
>they be found these days?
>
> I'm not hearing anything out of AO-10 tonight, either. This may be
>because it is in eclipse (which it seems to be), or is it dead as well (or
>perhaps I have an equipment problem?)? Yes, I know AO-40 is up there,
but
>as nearly as I can determine, the only downlink band they've been able to
>get working thus far is 2.4 gigs. While I have one of the Drake 2880's
and
>a preamp, the antenna situation worries me a bit. I own a Bob Myer's
>bar-b-que grill dish, which I've been using for years on 802.11 (the old 3
>Mbps version), but I can't see how my current antenna setup is going to
>accommodate such a large, unbalanced antenna as this. Has anyone had any
>luck using a long loop yagi or other antenna that can be mounted on a
>crossboom in a fashion that is balanced and doesn't twist the crossboom?
>
> This all leaves me a bit puzzled. When the highest OSCAR number was 25,
>there were at least 3 9600 baud digital satellites available, either 3 or
4
>PSK satellites available, and AO-10 and AO-13 for DX work. In a
relatively
>short period of time we've made it up to OSCAR 46, but what are all these
>satellites doing? I conclude from this that I must be mis-reading the
>material on the AMSAT webpage and have just failed to find the relevant
new
>birds. Any suggestions on where to proceed from here would be
appreciated.
>
>John Hansen, W2FS
>
>
>----
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>
>
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home