[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: go ahead for P3-E and P5-A
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] go ahead for P3-E and P5-A
- From: CLVANCIL@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:02:23 EDT
Hi All,
Every help build an OSCAR satellite, Robert? Hams can be proud of the
work done on these OSCAR spacecraft. Things AMSAT members thought up have
influenced more expensive Commercial Communications Satellites.
AMSAT accepts a much higher failure rate than Boeing, etc. because AMSAT uses
spare parts, donated secondhand equipment and off the shelf modified
hardware. AO 40 if done as a Commercial Satellite would have cost an order
of magnitude more and wouldn't just have taxed our pockets, but bankrupted
us.
There is a reason the AMSAT-DL has budgeted this Phase 5 Mars Bird at almost
an order of magnitude more than AO-40 and have found some funding inside the
German Government. These extra costs aren't in the distance the craft
travels, but in the testing and super high quality control need in order to
maintain a near zero failure rate. If they should fail it would have been a
good stretching of skills and minds and AMSAT would be better for it, besdes
we would be in good company. NASA, Russian and Japan so far have been the onl
y "groups" to send spacecraft towards Mars and all have had failures. When
ESA sends there missions to Mars expect some problems and some failure with
work arounds and hopefully some very exciting images and science!
Robert, all you show is you have no imagination and a clear lack of
comprehension of the amazing history of AMSAT and orbital dynamics with this
solar orbit BS.
--Chris Vancil
In a message dated 7/29/02 12:07:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
owner-AMSAT-BB-digest@AMSAT.Org writes:
>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:37:09 -0500
> From: "Robert Oler" <cvn65vf94@msn.com
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] go ahead for P3-E and P5-A
>
> Hello Dennis.
>
> you are of course missing the point of the discussion
>
> <<What the naysayers do not realize in stark
> technical terms is that ALL of the phase III birds have had a significant
> delta
> V capability. >>
>
> the problem is not that the "newtons" are not there to do the job...the
> problem is that (to be kind) the execution of propulsion on the Phase 3
> birds has been...an incomplete success.
>
> In particular AO-40 is well we are lucky the darn thing isnt in little
> pieces or some flotsam in solar orbit.
>
> Not a single bit of the propulsion system worked as advertised. In other
> words the folks who played rocket scientist are well "amateurs".
>
> Off to fly the big airplane.
>
> Robert Oler WB5MZO
>
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home