[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Trees and antennas and stuff
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Trees and antennas and stuff
- From: Christopher E Phelps <n2yqp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:17:17 -0600
Where I first lived in upstate NY we lived in a valley and had to put our TV
ant on top of a hill. Had 500ft of foam 300ohm line coming down the hill.
one station was our local uhf ch 18 (494-500MHz). When it rained the signal
would drop to almost nothing but then if it froze, the signal came in like
gangbusters. after a rain I would open an upstairs window and give the line
a good shake that would oscillate up the hill ( had line suspended so I
could do that ) and as the water dropped off, up came the signal
dramatically.
Chris N2YQP
----- Original Message -----
From: "James H. Jipping" <jjipping@macatawa.org>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 7:22 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Trees and antennas and stuff
> Good Morning, everyone:
>
> I recall my days back at the University of Minnesota working with
> oscillators and using a Faraday Box. As you recall a Faraday Box is a
box
> that completely (or hoped to be ) confines any radiation inside. When Mode
> B first came about and the "new" 435 Mhz band was used I noticed that the
> trees which surround my house, when wet, were trying to be my own natural
> Faraday Box. The effect can be very noticeable, even, a 435Mhz when the
> trees are dense and wet. And, yes, the Tree Faraday Box gets better and
> better as the frequency increase.
>
> There are lots of interesting things going on.
>
> As the wavelength become a significantly small fraction of the openings in
> the screen used for a Faraday box other things happen, diffraction
begins
> to take place. I doubt whether this has a chance of happening with trees
> as there are many, many layers of natural screens.
>
> I recall the difficulty radio astronomers have when the spacing between
> rain drops approximates the wavelength of the signal desired to be
> detected. This is different than the Faraday Box, but what about the size
> of a wet leaf (hundreds of wet leaves) as compared to that wavelength of a
> 2.4 Ghz signal ???
>
> My front yard trees do not allow me to "see" through them for reception of
> AO-40. As soon as AO-40 move in the clear I hear it again.
>
> Jim Jipping, W8MRR
> AMSAT 5512.
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home