[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: [aprssig] APRS Field Day operation 2002


The intent of the AMSAT rule is the topic. It is interpreted to discourage
than one contact, even though multiple efficient contacts could be
with one transmission.  It is very clear there would be no other reason for
specific statement in the rules. This goes against the spirit of Field Day
in being
more efficient with our communications techniques.

Digital communications is far more efficient than voice on an FM satellite.
More information is passed in a single transmission.

Yes, you can make more than one contact, but then that would be out of line
with the intention of the AMSAT rules that discourages that activity. On the
hand, it would be in full compliance with the ARRL Field Day rules. That is
the difference comes into the picture. These are the differentiating rules
the two organizations that are likely to create a problem for the folks
under either the AMSAT rules or the ARRL rules. If somebody witnesses
station making multiple contacts operating under the AMSAT rules and they
not successful in their attempts, there is likely to be an issue. This is
the basic
problem created when resources are shared under different rules.

Tim - N8DEU

PS: I dropped the APRSSIG off the distribution since this is not an issue
for that

----- Original Message -----
From: <K5OE@aol.com>
To: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@usna.edu>; "Tim Cunningham"
Cc: "TAPR APRS Special Interest Group" <aprssig@lists.tapr.org>;
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [aprssig] APRS Field Day operation 2002

> Bob,
> Your suggestion of multiple call in the QSL line is very efficient and
good operating practice.  Your last line says it all:  there is no limit in
anobody's (AMSAT or ARRL) rules about how many calls (or packets) you can
make or how many QSO's you can make.  The AMSAT restriction is for how many
QSO's you can COUNT for points.  Since both ISS and PCsat are really just FM
repeaters, the opportunity for frustration is just as high as on AO-27 or
UO-14.  Thus, the rules were changed this year to allow people to use their
digital systems, but hopefully not to hog the satellite or contribute to the
"white noise" that appears when too many people are all trying to uplink at
the same time.  Let's hope nobody connects to ISS on FD, as that could be
quite unpopular!
> 73,
> Jerry, K5OE/G
> In a message dated Thu, 13 Jun 2002 7:50:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Bob
Bruninga <bruninga@usna.edu> writes:
> >On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Tim Cunningham wrote:
> >
> >> AMSAT Field Day rules are restrictive in the area of APRS for
> >> http://www.amsat.org/amsat/activities/amsatfd.html
> >>
> >> "Satellite digipeat QSO's and APRS short-message contacts are worth
> >> points each, but must be complete verified two-way exchanges. Remember,
> >> only one digipeat contact is allowed for the ISS and one for PCSat."
> >
> >Wow, I had forgotten that. I guess then since it is impossible to have
> >a contact and send LESS than one packet, that ONE QSL packet is the
> >limit. But since in the APRS AUTO-QSL mode, ONE packet can have up to 8
> >QSL callsigns in it, then I see no problem with everyone limiting
> >themselves to ONLY ONE QSL packet, but they can list as many as 8 calls
> >in their packet if they wish to improve their probabilities of a 2-way.
> >
> >They can only count ONE QSO, and it only counts if they have both QSL'ed
> >another call and the other call has QSL'ed them. But this rule does not
> >prohibit the number of calls you put in your "SINGLE" authorized
> >or at least that seems to be in the spirit of the objectives of Field
> >
> >This way, potentialy 64 stations could have valid two-ways on a single
> >pass with a theorietically minimum of only 64 packets on the air. But
> >doing it the conventional CONNECTED way, would take 19,845 successful
> >packets! Impossible.
> >
> >
> >Here is how the AMSAT rules define a verified 2-way exchange as taking 3
> >packets:
> >
> > 1. W6NWG de KK5DO 2A STX
> > 2. KK5DO de W6NWG QSL 5A SDG
> > 3. W6NWG de KK5DO QSL
> >
> >But since PCsat and ISS are UI digipeats that do not fit the "CONNECTED"
> >packet protocol model, here is how I interpret that relative to how we
> >have been doing space digipeter and FD APRS contacts in the past:
> >
> > 1. Is yours and other's APRS position reports with ARRL exchange in it
> > 2. Is your BLN1CQFD bulletin containing the stations you are QSLing
> > 3. Is HIS BLN1CQFD bulletin with YOUR callsign in it..
> >
> >These are concise, efficient, verified and verifiable 2-way contacts.
> >(But you can only count one completed 2-way per bird).
> >
> >de WB4APR, BOb
> >
> >
> >----
> >Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> >To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> >

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org