Re: [amsat-bb] FCC elevates hams to primary status, 2400-2402 MHz

[Margaret Leber <maggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wayne Estes W9AE wrote:

> Maybe we should write letters to the ARRL saying that we DON'T think hams
> can continue to accomodate Part 15 devices at 2.4 GHz.

Worse yet, I've seen some trade press suggesting that there are Part 15 
users that don't think they can accomodate Part 18 users. If Part 18 RF 
lighting devices threaten to kill Part 15 usage, how are we supposed to 
accomodate both?

See: http://www.strohpub.com/0701feat.htm

73 de Maggie K3XS

-- 
-----/___.   _)   Margaret Stephanie Leber    / "The art of progress  /
----/(, /|  /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie   / consists of preserving/
---/   / | / |  _   _   _    `  _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) /  |/  |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_  FN20hd / change amid order."   /
-/ (_/   '  K3XS  .-/ .-/    ARRL 39280   /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>


----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org